Analysis Result

"Will internet advertising grow to be one of the leading future advertising elements compared to TV, Newspaper, Radio Ads, etc, which is the desired choice amongst the populace now."

That was our latest poll question. Readers cast their votes through multiple choices of 3.

1. YES.
2. NO.
   
3. MAYBE. ONLY WITH KNOWING HOW TO ADAPT TO THE USAGE BEHAVIORS OF THE MEDIUM.
   

Through total votes of 8 readers, 50% voted on YES. 37.5% voted NO and 12.5% voted MAYBE. ONLY WITH KNOWING HOW TO ADAPT TO THE USAGE BEAVIORS OF THE MEDIUM.

Analysis question was based on the topic PREDICAMENT OF INTERNET ADVERTISING which was very much connected to our past several posts. Some of them include TV ADS vs ONLINE ADS and ONLINE WEBSITE ADVERTISING. These two posts discussed how TV Ads is still one of the favourite entertaining medium among the masses although online advertising is massively growing these days. On the other hand, we also mentioned how internet advertising grows more creative in order to fit in the competitive challenge of other advertising medium.

Looking at the readers' votes, majority of them believes internet advertising will be a successful advertising medium in coming future. I suppose this is possible only if advertisers put on more effort in knowing the target market for each online advertising product and similarly emphasize on more interactivity, attention grabbing elements into each online ad. Moreover, technology is gradually more prevailing. TV can be used touch panel, and surf online. The question come to pass can people lives without TV? =)

Analysis Result

Hi there, the analysis of the polls result is out today. The poll question were "Do you think Google should be responsible on the delay of updating that causes the lost of AdSense Advertiser and AdWords Publisher?"

The answers are :

a) Yes.Google had caused the lost.
b) Yes.Google should only responsible partially.
c) No.It was not Google's fault.
d) No.It was an unexpected incident.

The analysis result shown that :
(1) 40% people voted for "b) Yes.Google should only responsible partially."
(2) 30% people voted for "c) No.It was not Google's fault.
(3) 20% people voted for "d) No.It was an unexpected incident."
(4) 10% people voted for ''a) Yes.Google had caused the lost."


Hence, this mean that most of the people thinks Google should not fully responsible for this issue but partially. However, there are many thinking that the incident was not Google's fault. In my opinion, the most perfect system will have its weakness too. Thus, i feel that it was not Google's fault but Google should be responsible to it partially to those who affected by the incident to make others confident and continue to use Google's service.

Analysis Result

Good evening! I hope everyone had an awesome Valentine celebration!!

Here we are again analysing the result for our last poll. Thank you, readers whom cast their votes. =)

Poll Question: Is online advertising application, excellent money making way?

Votes are picked in the midst of 4 multiple choice answers:

Answer 1: YES.

Answer 2:
NO. THESE ONLINE ADVERTISING APPLICATIONs SOUNDED VERY ALIENATED.

Answer 3: YES, WITH PLENTY OF RESEARCH.

Answer 4: NO.

And, the result was, Answer 1 (YES), 3 (NO. THESE ONLINE ADVERTISING APPLICATIONS SOUNDED VERY ALIENATED) and 4 (NO) split equal votes, 20% apiece. Whereas Answer 2 (NO. THESE ONLINE ADVERTISING APPLICATIONs SOUNDED VERY ALIENATED) had seized the highest votes, 40%.

Yes. The conclusion was very evident that many people (in Malaysia I supposed) is still very novel, bizarre, blur, and might only have very vague impression on what precisely does an online application works, to bring us funds. One of the reader as well question, how much "PPC" pay per click. One adorable question, which we will discuss in our coming post this week. The trend is still dawdling in the market.

Stay with us for our next post, to read more about Pay Per Click.

Analysis Result

The analysis result is finally out! I would like to put across my big gratitude to Vizu Web Polls for their friendly user interface and not forgetting an ocean of thanks to readers whom read and make an effort to cast a vote. =)

Readers pick their vote through multiple choices in a list of 4.

1. a) YES
   
2. b) NO. I'LL JUST PASS. IT ISN'T THAT MADDENING YET.
   
3. c) NO. CAUSE I AM ALREADY DOING THAT PHYSICALLY. NO NEED INSTALLATION HASSLES.
   
4. d) NO. CAUSE I FIND THESE ADS INTERESTING AND NOT BOTHERSOME AT ALL.
   

The survey exploring where internet ads could be disturbing concludes that internet advertising is really and truly maddening. 50% of readers voted on C, whereas A & D ended with fair percentage of 25%. Ironically, none of any readers cast a vote on B.

This is a universal predicament that makes all advertising agencies vulnerable. The failure of advertisers apply its artistic magic to online advertising space illustrate how the absence of genuine interactivity – in this case, developed by advertising agencies with marketers - makes it impossible to realize digital's potential. Interactivity that gives consumers of what they want and are willing to pay for, is the plum growth vehicle that eludes many companies, even as broadband is burgeoning as a global lifeline for critical communication and entertainment.

The predicament of online advertisers advertises online without knowing their market and core purposes would prolonged unless media and advertisers use interactivity to capture surfers' attention. Nonetheless, knowing consumers' desire is fairly important too.

Thousands of disparate tiny steps are being taken to explore connectivity as a hub utility at a time when bold strides are needed. This is, after all, no recessionary retrenchment; it's a revolution.